Comparing ATS options to Lever? This 2026 guide breaks down 14 top alternatives by team size, hiring volume, integrations, and compliance needs—so you can pick the right platform and scale hiring smoothly.
January 10, 2026
If you’re evaluating alternatives to Lever, you’re probably not questioning whether you need an ATS — you’re questioning whether your current setup still fits.
A lot changes between:
That’s why this guide breaks 14 top ATS options down by team size, hiring volume, and workflow complexity — and then shows how Tenzo removes the single biggest bottleneck that every ATS shares: manual screening and scheduling.
If you want the shortlist first:
Lever is popular because it blends ATS + CRM workflows — great for tracking candidates, conversations, and pipeline stages in one place.
But teams often start exploring alternatives when they hit one (or more) of these friction points:
One key mindset shift:
Your ATS organizes hiring. It rarely eliminates the work of hiring. That’s where automation (done right) matters.
Use these to get from “we need something else” to “we know what we actually need.”
If you’re filling:
Ask: does it actually connect to what you run today — HRIS, payroll, background checks, assessments, email/calendar, identity?
BambooHR, for example, highlights 150+ integrations for its ATS ecosystem. (BambooHR)
If consistency matters (quality, fairness, defensibility), prioritize platforms built around structured workflows and scorecards. Greenhouse scorecards are explicitly designed around predetermined criteria. (Greenhouse Support)
If you hire across countries or need formal audit trails, enterprise suites like Workday are designed for high-volume hiring and workflow automation at scale. (Workday)
Posting jobs and moving stages isn’t the same as eliminating screening and scheduling.
That’s why many teams pair their ATS with Tenzo, which automates sourcing, screening, and scheduling across channels while keeping recruiters in control. (Tenzo AI)
Best for: small-to-mid teams that want recruiting tightly connected to HR records
Why teams choose it: BambooHR positions its ATS as an end-to-end flow from application to employee record, plus analytics and integrations. (BambooHR)
Pricing: typically quote-based depending on modules
Watch-outs: best when you’re committed to BambooHR as the system of record.
Best for: growing companies that want recruiting connected to onboarding + IT provisioning
Why teams choose it: Rippling introduced Recruiting as an ATS designed to connect hiring steps and automate admin work. (Rippling)
Pricing: module-based / quote-based
Watch-outs: can get expensive as you add more Rippling modules.
Best for: enterprise organizations hiring at high volumes across regions
Why teams choose it: Workday highlights high-volume hiring, bulk processing, and workflow automation; Workday Recruiting also integrates into Workday HCM workflows and skills-based approaches. (Workday)
Pricing: enterprise quote
Watch-outs: implementation effort is real — this is not a “set it up this afternoon” product.
Best for: teams that want broad sourcing reach and international flexibility
Why teams choose it: Manatal markets job distribution to 2,500+ channels and transparent starting pricing. (Manatal)
Pricing: starts at $15/user/month (per Manatal pricing page). (Manatal)
Watch-outs: validate the depth of reporting and workflow complexity you need before committing.
Best for: teams that want predictable pricing + job distribution at scale
Why teams choose it: Workable promotes one-click posting to 200+ job boards and publishes starting pricing tiers on its pricing page. (Workable Help)
Pricing: published plans starting at $299/month (varies by headcount). (Greenhouse Partner Directory)
Watch-outs: advanced customization and enterprise needs may push you into higher tiers.
Best for: global organizations needing enterprise-grade compliance + configurability
Why teams choose it: SmartRecruiters describes compliance coverage (including ISO 27001 / SOC 2 and GDPR) and a marketplace of 575+ pre-integrated apps, plus availability in 37 languages. (SmartRecruiters)
Pricing: enterprise quote
Watch-outs: typically best fit for organizations with meaningful req volume and process rigor.
Best for: teams that want consistent, defensible hiring decisions
Why teams choose it: Greenhouse scorecards use predetermined criteria to support structured hiring, and Greenhouse provides DE&I reporting capabilities like pipeline-by-demographic reporting. (Greenhouse Support)
Pricing: quote-based (Greenhouse confirms pricing varies by company size). (Greenhouse)
Watch-outs: you’ll get the most value if your team commits to structured process, not “hire however each manager prefers.”
Best for: small businesses that want simple workflows and quick time-to-value
Pricing: JazzHR advertises plans starting at $350/month. (Tenzo AI)
Why teams choose it: SMB-friendly recruiting tooling with lightweight administration.
Watch-outs: if you need deep enterprise governance or complex multi-entity rules, you may outgrow it.
Best for: startups and SMBs that want a very visual pipeline and strong candidate comms
Why teams choose it: Breezy emphasizes drag-and-drop pipelines and automated emailing/SMS. (Breezy HR)
Pricing: Breezy publishes tiered monthly pricing (e.g., Bootstrap / Startup / Growth / Business). (Pinpoint)
Watch-outs: make sure your reporting needs are covered before scaling req volume.
Best for: teams with stronger compliance workflows (UK/EU-leaning) and integration-driven hiring
Why teams choose it: Pinpoint highlights integrations that support compliance workflows like Right to Work checks through partners. (Pinpoint Help Center)
Pricing: quote-based
Watch-outs: always confirm what’s native vs. partner-based in your stack.
Best for: teams already using Zoho and wanting configurable recruiting licensing
Why teams choose it: Zoho Recruit provides a corporate pricing model with recruiter licenses, job limits, and integrations (50+ integrations shown on its corporate pricing page). (Zoho)
Pricing: published via Zoho’s pricing pages (varies by edition and licenses). (Zoho)
Watch-outs: the pricing structure is more “configuration + licenses” than a simple per-seat plan.
Best for: enterprise TA orgs building a broader talent cloud
Why teams choose it: iCIMS positions its ATS inside a Talent Cloud with 300+ marketplace products and bidirectional integration with major HCM/payroll providers. (iCIMS)
Pricing: enterprise quote
Watch-outs: iCIMS shines when you need enterprise depth (not when you just want “a clean ATS”).
Best for: companies that prioritize recruitment marketing + automation at scale
Why teams choose it: Jobvite markets built-in recruitment marketing and analytics, plus dedicated recruitment marketing platform capabilities. (jobvite.com)
Pricing: quote-based
Watch-outs: best value shows up when you actively run campaigns, referrals, and nurture flows — not just “post and pray.”
Best for: staffing agencies that need recruiting + back office workflows
Why teams choose it: Bullhorn highlights ATS/VMS automation and back office workflows like invoicing terms and billing rules. (Bullhorn)
Pricing: quote-based
Watch-outs: Bullhorn is purpose-built for agencies — internal TA teams usually prefer other options.
Here’s the part most ATS comparisons skip:
Even with the “perfect” ATS, recruiters still spend enormous time on:
That’s why high-performing teams pair their ATS with Tenzo.
Tenzo is designed to automate the repetitive recruiting work while your ATS remains the source of truth.
Tenzo’s AI agents can:
Tenzo’s positioning is simple: automate the boring stuff so recruiters can focus on human connection. (Tenzo AI)
When teams shop ATSs, they often over-rotate on:
Those matter — but they don’t fix throughput.
If you’re hiring at any meaningful volume, the winning approach is usually:
Lever is often categorized as an ATS that includes CRM-style functionality (pipeline and candidate relationship workflows).
If you want fast setup and a visual pipeline: Breezy HR or JazzHR are common choices. (Breezy HR)
For global enterprise workflows, SmartRecruiters and Workday Recruiting are popular options depending on your stack and compliance requirements. (SmartRecruiters)
Tenzo is designed to complement your ATS by automating sourcing, screening, and scheduling while keeping your team focused on high-value work. (Tenzo AI)
Common triggers:
Pick an ATS that fits your team’s size, compliance needs, and workflow complexity — then let Tenzo automate the repetitive steps that slow every hiring team down.
Want to see how Tenzo fits your stack? Book a Tenzo demo. (Tenzo AI)
The latest news, interviews, and resources from industry leaders in AI.
Go to Blog
.avif){kind=small}
